To whom this concerns,
I made a grave error in judgement. I failed to accurately empathize with the Navy's position relative to my own, failing to recognize what seemed certain to me still seemed uncertain to the Navy. I omitted critical information from my SF-86 form an accusation of mental illness likely an abuse of process. Rather than have myself evaluated proving those old allegations false, I accepted undue risk comfortably treating the event as if obvious libel. February 2015, a foreign-national, whom I regard an ex-custodian, (to say someone who once had custody of me but no longer) called police claiming I threatened suicide by means of fleeing into dangerous winter weather, had me admitted to a hospital where that individual had an instructor position, then seemingly engaged in corrupt illegal activities to have me kept there against my will even when the in-take doctor recommended immediate discharge. I personally never received diagnosis, but an affidavit of mental illness claimed I had an "unspecified pre-schizophrenoform disorder" filed by a psychiatrist there with my ex-custodian's influence. Subsequent to my discharge, that ex-custodian petitioned guardianship to suspend my liberty, free choice and free movement indefinitely, by alleging my incompetence. The hospital refused any involvement therein. Meanwhile that individual openly tried to justify their action, by asserting that a foreign law grants emancipation at 21 and a foreign custom whereby dependents do not emancipate themselves until marriage. Trauma not lack of confidence led me to omit those details from my SF-86. Trying to remember any dates around then caused for me great discomfort. Adding those details would have caused little more. Lack of will rather than lack of ability to endure, hit me convincing myself those details would turn out unimportant so that I wouldn't have to continue. When the investigator asked me in-person, I lied for the very same reason. Once caught in lie, I realized the need to explain those events as accurately as possible. At that point, any need to prove my fitness for duty had not yet occurred to me.
     04 of August, Senior Chief Stitch, who had not met me nor who I had known to be in my chain of command, referred me to behavioral health. Senior Chief communicated no recommendation from any instructor to me, but began by referring to me to behavioral health with the words "you do not have a choice". I tried to demonstrate my competence, then to argue alignment with and zeal for the Navy's mission, then I cried. Senior Chief said "we will get you on a boat", then I left escorted by the head instructor whom my LCPO introduced me to because of excellent constructive feedback given in prior schools. Mx Glennon interviewed me asking if I had prior admittance to a hospital, which I answered honestly. Mx Glennon saw little problem with me, but recommended me for full evaluation. I felt Mx Glennon had intention to prove my fitness for full duty preemptively. Mx Glennon scheduled me to meet Lieutenant Commander Widroff. I felt excited to meet a ranking officer. Later staff phoned my schoolhouse to say LTCDR Widroff went on leave then scheduled me to meet Mx Difilippo, a civilian. Then, after a gruelling interview and intense personality test, Mx Difilippo stated showed no diagnosible traits but the test indicated me likely to hide characteristics or refuse service. We established many questions predicated on rare occurrences in my life, such partying which explained the "overly positive" image I presented of myself. We also established homeschooling delayed as well as accelerated social development in different categories, and internet culture socialized me during those years. Mx Difilippo described the internet like a national identity I possess. I contested that made the reason seem political. I reminded Mx Difilippo Trump is the President. Mx Difilippo reminded me an election approaches. 
    Irregardless whether I qualify a cultured American or rather hail from a fictitious country, my story gives zeal to distinctly American ideals of life, liberty, and happiness, which lends a few scattered but important moments I felt omission more than ethical morally imperative for how one learns a story often determines how potently one experiences that story. Since the memorandum's issuance by a civilian in medical, I have taken an obligation to tell every person interested even for a moment in the details of my life this supposedly secret story from my background. America has sacrificed enough identity for the sake of the world. Truth told, I never embrace American culture except at intersections with internet memes, which in truth intersects in many ways. Freud's legacy created mental health to sterilize information one exposes self and ego to, for environments minimally toxic to maximum individuals, but there involves no healing; there exists no "health" in mental health only safety. Jung's legacy created a massive internet subculture to encourage self-exposure to isolation a new frontier very dangerous to seek how to heal harm in minds. If behavioral health cleans America's wounds, I intend to heal wounds. Me as well as legions of Anonymous who have heeded Trump's dogwhistle. Why should a few uncomfortable truths give cause to separate me? I would say to any sailor, even Senior Chief Stitch, "if you can't stand up to tell truth, whole truth or personal truth, then you don't deserve to wear that uniform". If America must separate from truthsayers for America's mental health, especially on account of a distinctly American story about pursuing personal liberty, that can only symbolize a withdrawl from America's proprietary obligation protecting the world that, mark my words, either Russia or China, one will inevitably commit physical genocide by embracing eugenic ideology or another causes psychological genocide starting with a grand scale war against internet culture. I joined because I know what needs done. For my contract, I have dedicated myself to helping America and to the mission we share. Do not make this mistake.