Yeah, we know TheThingsNetwork well (it got us started with LoRaWAN!), and for community/public stuff it's fine, but once you get into the private pricing and reliability it gets... interesting.

We're successfully running LoRaServer.io in production for a couple of Vineyards in the Coonawarra region ( https://www.mockingbirdconsulting.co.uk/case_studies/joto-systems/ ), but we're aware that TTN have far better brand awareness on this kind of thing, and we have neither the people nor the budget to fight that, so we're sitting here quietly, getting the message out that there is an alternative, and unlike all the other providers we don't care how many gateways or end-nodes you have connected, we bill based on the amount of storage you're using for your metrics, because that's where our costs are.

Anyway, sales pitch over ;) I agree that keeping subscriptions agnostic is a great idea, and I'm really quite excited about helping to bring LoRaWAN connectivity into FarmOS :)