vandemar: dude i dont think you understand the security advantages of having an openbsd port. fuck server market share completely. you want developer market share and thats where openbsd has the monopoly.  if you look at popular software out there youll see a large part of that softwares success is due to its openbsd user base not its other user bases. go look at the openbsd standards for actually accepting a port (its literally like a semi security audit) and more importantly look at pledge (fuck other operating systems... seccomp is a nice try but pledge has a clean and simple implementation process) and then look at what it takes to get into base (thats the golden standard for software security period). if ipfs makes it into base it will be audited on par with openssh.  if you look at openbsd from a marketshare perspective youre throwing your computer science brain out the window. openbsd determines what goes on servers for the majority of sysadmins that have large infrastructure (over 1 million servers like nasa, cern, nsa, DOE, etc) more than market share statistics from aws and azure. please trust me on this one it is a golden opportunity for ipfs. for my application as of right now ipfs is just experimental nonsense. it all comes down to the fact that in my infrastructure 1/2000 nodes is openbsd but ooenbsd decides everything for me and thats how everybody does it in the real world. i will never compromise my obsd boxes for software or feature compatibility and i would say the majority of security folk that handle large infrastructure agree with me. openbsd decides all our hardware decisions and software packages.