bamse: any idea why PLL naming is so missleading?
I noticed this patch:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20221227132507.2506-1-quic_kathirav@quicinc.com/
It mentions "Stromer PLL"
i found mentions of this pll also in sources of LK:
https://github.com/msm8916-mainline/lk2nd/commit/babab6d39b760e918f1cca662f7e662e2433f088
It appears also to be used on 8937 and 8953 however layout is nowhere close to one in patchwork patch.